<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Andrea Olivo | LIP6 - Équipe QI</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/people/andrea-olivo/</link><atom:link href="https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/people/andrea-olivo/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Andrea Olivo</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>fr</language><copyright>© 2022 LIP6 Quantum Information Team</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Leveraging small quantum states: applications to linear optics and position verification</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/defended_thesis/andrea-olivo/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/defended_thesis/andrea-olivo/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;40 years after Feynman&amp;rsquo;s pioneering talk, it is clear that Quantum Information (QI) is here to stay. Research in this field is building a bridge between computer science and quantum mechanics, which is advancing our understanding of both disciplines as well as providing fertile ground for new applications. My research work focuses on two tasks pertaining to separate areas of QI, quantum linear optics and quantum cryptography.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first part of the manuscript, we characterize the effectiveness of small auxiliary states in boosting the success probability of linear optical Bell measurement, which is the basis of many of the promising applications of quantum linear optics. Auxiliary states are interesting in this context even if they cannot be deterministically prepared, because their creation can happen offline and they can be stored until the measurement is performed. We give analytical bounds to the success probability, under certain restrictions on the class of unitaries representing the interferometer, which are tight for known strategies. We then explore the space of all possible interferometers through a custom linear optics numerical optimization package. We confirm the optimality of known schemes and find some with intermediate performance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In part two, we explore a cryptographic primitive known as position verification in the quantum setting. We characterize the space of attacks to a simple, well known protocol parametrized by an angle θ, where the adversaries make use of precise timing and an entangled state to spoof their spacetime location. Through a circuit representation of the attacks, we determine necessary and sufficient conditions for the adversaries to succeed in breaking a specific θ
when using a d-dimensional state. Exploiting a graphical representation of the Hilbert space, we discover simpler proofs of already known results for d=2 and d=3, and we find many more &amp;ldquo;weak&amp;rdquo; angles for d up to 12, as well as explicit circuits of the attacking strategies. Finally, we relax the assumption of exact attacks by allowing the adversaries a small probability of failure, discovering that two ebits are sufficient to break every angle with &amp;gt;99.5% probability, and we discuss some modifications of the protocol which could enhance its resistance to these attack strategies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Breaking simple quantum position verification protocols with little entanglement</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/2915994-breaking-simple-quantum-position-verification-protocols-with-little-entanglement/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/2915994-breaking-simple-quantum-position-verification-protocols-with-little-entanglement/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Instantaneous nonlocal quantum computation (INQC) evades apparent quantum and relativistic constraints and allows to attack generic quantum position verification (QPV) protocols (aiming at securely certifying the location of a distant prover) at an exponential entanglement cost. We consider adversaries sharing maximally entangled pairs of qudits and find low-dimensional INQC attacks against the simple practical family of QPV protocols based on single photons polarized at an angle $\theta$. We find exact attacks against some rational angles, including some sitting outside of the Clifford hierarchy (e.g. $\pi/6$), and show no $\theta$ allows to tolerate errors higher than $\simeq 5\cdot 10^{-3}$ against adversaries holding two ebits per protocol&amp;rsquo;s qubit.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>