Anne Broadbent | LIP6 - Équipe QI

The Role of Piracy in Quantum Proofs

Wed, 01 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000

A well-known feature of quantum information is that it cannot, in general, be cloned. Recently, a number of quantum-enabled information-processing tasks have demonstrated various forms of uncloneability; among these forms, piracy is an adversarial model that gives maximal power to the adversary in controlling both a cloning-type attack, as well as the evaluation/verification stage. Here, we initiate the study of anti-piracy proof systems, which are proof systems that inherently prevent piracy attacks. We define anti-piracy proof systems, demonstrate such a proof system for an oracle problem, and also describe a candidate anti-piracy proof system for {$}{$}{\backslash}textsf {{}NP {}} {$}{$}NP. We also study quantum proof systems that are cloneable and settle the famous QMA vs. {$}{$}{\backslash}textsf {{}QMA {}} (2){$}{$}QMA(2)debate in this setting. Lastly, we discuss how one can approach the QMA vs. QCMA question, by studying its cloneable variants.

A classical proof of quantum knowledge for multi-prover interactive proof systems

Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000

In a proof of knowledge (PoK), a verifier becomes convinced that a prover possesses privileged information. In combination with zero-knowledge proof systems, PoKs are an important part of secure protocols such as digital signature schemes and authentication schemes as they enable a prover to demonstrate possession of a certain piece of information (such as a private key or a credential), without revealing it. Formally, A PoK is defined via the existence of an extractor, which is capable of reconstructing the key information that makes a verifier accept, given oracle access to the prover. We extend the concept of a PoK in the setting of a single classical verifier and two quantum provers, and exhibit the PoK property for a non-local game for the local Hamiltonian problem. More specifically, we construct an extractor which, given oracle access to a provers’ strategy that leads to high acceptance probability, is able to reconstruct the ground state of a local Hamiltonian. Our result can be seen as a new form of self-testing, where, in addition to certifying a pre-shared entangled state and the prover’s strategy, the verifier also certifies a local quantum state. This technique thus provides a method to ascertain that a prover has access to a quantum system, in particular, a ground state, thus indicating a new level of verification for a proof of quantumness.

The Role of piracy in quantum proofs

Mon, 07 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0000

A well-known feature of quantum information is that it cannot, in general, be cloned. Recently, a number of quantum-enabled information-processing tasks have demonstrated various forms of uncloneability; among these forms, piracy is an adversarial model that gives maximal power to the adversary, in controlling both a cloning-type attack, as well as the evaluation/verification stage. Here, we initiate the study of anti-piracy proof systems, which are proof systems that inherently prevent piracy attacks. We define anti-piracy proof systems, demonstrate such a proof system for an oracle problem, and also describe a candidate anti-piracy proof system for NP. We also study quantum proof systems that are cloneable and settle the famous QMA vs. QMA(2) debate in this setting. Lastly, we discuss how one can approach the QMA vs. QCMA question, by studying its cloneable variants.

QMA-Hardness of Consistency of Local Density Matrices with Applications to Quantum Zero-Knowledge

Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0000

QMA-Hardness of Consistency of Local Density Matrices with Applications to Quantum Zero-Knowledge

Mon, 16 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0000

We provide several advances to the understanding of the class of Quantum Merlin-Arthur proof systems (QMA), the quantum analogue of NP. First, we answer a longstanding open question by showing that the Consistency of Local Density Matrices problem is QMA-complete under Karp reductions. We also show for the first time a commit-and-open computational zero-knowledge proof system for all of QMA as a quantum analogue of a “sigma” protocol. We then define a Proof of Quantum Knowledge, which guarantees that a prover is effectively in possession of a quantum witness in an interactive proof, and show that our zero-knowledge proof system satisfies this definition. Finally, we show that our proof system can be used to establish that QMA has a quantum non-interactive zero-knowledge proof system in the secret parameters setting. Our main technique consists in developing locally simulatable proofs for all of QMA: this is an encoding of a QMA witness such that it can be efficiently verified by probing only five qubits and, furthermore, the reduced density matrix of any five-qubit subsystem can be computed in polynomial time and is independent of the witness. This construction follows the techniques of Grilo, Slofstra, and Yuen [FOCS 2019].