<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Céline Chevalier | LIP6 - Équipe QI</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/people/celine-chevalier/</link><atom:link href="https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/people/celine-chevalier/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Céline Chevalier</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>fr</language><copyright>© 2022 LIP6 Quantum Information Team</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Semi-Quantum Copy-Protection and More</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/4212664-semi-quantum-copy-protection-and-more/</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/4212664-semi-quantum-copy-protection-and-more/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Properties of quantum mechanics have enabled the emergence of quantum cryptographic protocols achieving important goals which are proven to be impossible classically. Unfortunately, this usually comes at the cost of needing quantum power from every party in the protocol, while arguably a more realistic scenario would be a network of classical clients, classically interacting with a quantum server. In this paper, we focus on copy-protection, which is a quantum primitive that allows a program to be evaluated, but not copied, and has shown interest especially due to its links to other unclonable cryptographic primitives. Our main contribution is to show how to dequantize quantum copy-protection schemes constructed from hidden coset states, by giving a construction for classically-instructed remote state preparation for coset states, which preserves hardness properties of hidden coset states. We then apply this dequantizer to obtain semi-quantum cryptographic protocols for copy-protection and tokenized signatures with strong unforgeability. In the process, we present the first secure copy-protection scheme for point functions in the plain model and a new direct product hardness property of coset states which immediately implies a strongly unforgeable tokenized signature scheme.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Correction to: Dispelling myths on superposition attacks: formal security model and attack analyses</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/4103602-correction-to-dispelling-myths-on-superposition-attacks-formal-security-model-and-attack-analyses/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/4103602-correction-to-dispelling-myths-on-superposition-attacks-formal-security-model-and-attack-analyses/</guid><description/></item><item><title>Dispelling myths on superposition attacks: formal security model and attack analyses</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/3943311-dispelling-myths-on-superposition-attacks-formal-security-model-and-attack-analyses/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/3943311-dispelling-myths-on-superposition-attacks-formal-security-model-and-attack-analyses/</guid><description/></item><item><title>Dispelling Myths on Superposition Attacks: Formal Security Model and Attack Analyses</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/3097496-dispelling-myths-on-superposition-attacks-formal-security-model-and-attack-analyses/</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/3097496-dispelling-myths-on-superposition-attacks-formal-security-model-and-attack-analyses/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It is of folkloric belief that the security of classical cryptographic protocols is automatically broken if the Adversary is allowed to perform superposition queries and the honest players forced to perform actions coherently on quantum states. Another widely held intuition is that enforcing measurements on the exchanged messages is enough to protect protocols from these attacks. However, the reality is much more complex. Security models dealing with superposition attacks only consider unconditional security. Conversely, security models considering computational security assume that all supposedly classical messages are measured, which forbids by construction the analysis of superposition attacks. Boneh and Zhandry have started to study the quantum computational security for classical primitives in their seminal work at Crypto'13, but only in the single-party setting. To the best of our knowledge, an equivalent model in the multiparty setting is still missing. In this work, we propose the first computational security model considering superposition attacks for multiparty protocols. We show that our new security model is satisfiable by proving the security of the well-known One-Time-Pad protocol and give an attack on a variant of the equally reputable Yao Protocol for Secure Two-Party Computations. The post-mortem of this attack reveals the precise points of failure, yielding highly counter-intuitive results: Adding extra classical communication, which is harmless for classical security, can make the protocol become subject to superposition attacks. We use this newly imparted knowledge to construct the first concrete protocol for Secure Two-Party Computation that is resistant to superposition attacks. Our results show that there is no straightforward answer to provide for either the vulnerabilities of classical protocols to superposition attacks or the adapted countermeasures.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>