<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tigran Sedrakyan | LIP6 - Équipe QI</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/people/tigran-sedrakyan/</link><atom:link href="https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/people/tigran-sedrakyan/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Tigran Sedrakyan</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>fr</language><copyright>© 2022 LIP6 Quantum Information Team</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Private training in quantum machine learning</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/5681512-private-training-in-quantum-machine-learning/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/5681512-private-training-in-quantum-machine-learning/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;With the emergence of machine learning (ML) models trained on large datasets containing potentially sensitive data, a major question in AI safety is how to make learning private with respect to the training data. Similar to classical machine learning, quantum machine learning (QML) models are not devoid of privacy vulnerabilities. Differential privacy (DP) is a standard tool for training ML models on sensitive data, but its impact in QML remains poorly understood. In this work we study private training in hybrid variational QML models using a classical private DP-SGD optimizer applied to pipelines with classical inputs and outputs. We analyze the interplay between gradient clipping and calibrated noise addition in DP-SGD, and its impact on optimization and accuracy for noisy and noiseless quantum models. We first explain why quantum noise does not provide a satisfactory replacement for the calibrated noise in DP-SGD for ensuring privacy. We then show how the deterministic bounds on gradient norms for a wide class of quantum models translate into explicit control of the detrimental clipping bias introduced by DP-SGD. Finally, we formulate a numerical comparison protocol under fixed clipping threshold and privacy budget and evaluate it on synthetic and image-classification tasks for equivalent quantum and classical models. Our results suggest that quantum models can retain higher accuracy in private-training regimes where the formal privacy guarantee is ensured by a classical DP-SGD mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Photonic quantum generative adversarial networks for classical data</title><link>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/4843001-photonic-quantum-generative-adversarial-networks-for-classical-data/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://qi.lip6.fr/fr/publication/4843001-photonic-quantum-generative-adversarial-networks-for-classical-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In generative learning, models are trained to produce new samples that follow the distribution of the target data. These models were historically difficult to train, until proposals such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) emerged, where a generative and a discriminative model compete against each other in a minimax game. Quantum versions of the algorithm have since been designed for the generation of both classical and quantum data. While most work so far has focused on qubit-based architectures, in this article we present a quantum GAN based on linear optical circuits and Fock-space encoding, which makes it compatible with near-term photonic quantum computing. We demonstrate that the model can learn to generate images by training the model end-to-end experimentally on a single-photon quantum processor.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>